The effects of adding ischemic preconditioning during desflurane inhalation anesthesia or propofol total intravenous anesthesia on pneumoperitoneum-induced oxidative stress.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to explore the differences in oxidative stress during anesthesia with desflurane/N2O or propofol/remifentanil in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and additionally to evaluate the differential effects of desflurane and propofol on ischemic preconditioning (IP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were randomly allocated to four groups. For anesthesia maintenance, the inhalation group (Group I) and the inhalation plus IP group (Group IIP) received desflurane at an end-tidal concentration of 4-6 vol% in oxygen/N2O, and the TIVA group (Group T) and TIVA plus IP group (Group TIP) received infusions of propofol and remifentanil. In Groups IIP and TIP, IP was carried out by 10 min of pneumoperitoneum followed by 10 min of deflation. Preoperative and postoperative plasma total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), paraoxonase, stimulated paraoxonase, arylesterase, ceruloplasmin, and myeloperoxidase levels were analyzed; oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated. RESULTS: When oxidative stress parameters were compared between groups, myeloperoxidase values in Group I were statistically significantly lower compared to Group TIP (p = .004 with Bonferroni's correction). There were no differences between preoperative and postoperative TAS, paraoxonase, stimulated paraoxonase, arylesterase, or ceruloplasmin levels (p > .05). In intragroup evaluations, postoperative paraoxonase and stimulated paraoxonase levels were found to be lower than preoperative values in Group TIP (p = .021 and .012, respectively). CONCLUSION: In laparoscopic cholecystectomy lasting less than 60 min, there were no differences in the measured oxidative stress parameters between maintenance of anesthesia by desflurane/N2O and propofol/remifentanil/N2O. The addition of 10 min IP administration during both anesthesia techniques did not result in additional changes in the analyzed oxidative stress.

A comparison of articaine and fentanyl-supplemented articaine for hemodialysis fistula creation under ultrasound-guided axillary block.

The aim of this prospective randomized, double-blinded study was to evaluate the effect of fentanyl addition to articaine on the duration of sensory as well as motor blocks, and the duration of analgesia during hemodialysis fistula creation under ultrasound-guided axillary block. Fifty patients were randomly allocated to two groups, an articaine group (A), receiving 40 mL of articaine HCI (20 mg/mL) with 2 mL of isotonic sodium chloride solution, and an articaine-fentanyl group (AF), receiving 40 mL of articaine HCI (20 mg/mL) with 2 mL (100 µg) of fentanyl. The onset as well as the duration of sensory and motor blocks, the time necessary for first analgesic administration, the hemodynamic parameters, and the side effects were recorded. Three patients in Group A and two patients in Group AF due to incomplete block were excluded from the study. The duration of sensory and motor blocks was significantly longer in the AF group than in the A group. The first time for analgesic need was also significantly longer in group AF (363 ± 134 min) than in group A (244 ± 84 min) (p = 0.001). The addition of fentanyl did not improve the onset of sensory and motor block times. Hemodynamic parameters were similar in the two groups. In conclusion, the addition of fentanyl to articaine in axillary block prolongs the duration of sensory and motor blocks, as well as the time of first analgesic requirement.